Talk:Valentín Carboni/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr Salvus (talk · contribs) 23:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

I'll take care of this, it's brief and I need to get points for the WikiCup. Dr Salvus 23:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Probably not everyone knows what Primavera team is, better having "under-19".
• I love FT Scout but it's a blog, unreliable source.
• Trasfermarkt is user-generated, another unrieliable source.
• "He has also got" "He also has"
• Probably there's no possibility to have sources because we're talking on a 17-yo player.

That's what I have. Dr Salvus 23:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus I've just edited the article by following your instructions, thank you.

However, I wanted to discuss some of the points you made, just for clarity:

- For now, I've kept the "Primavera" term in order to avoid making the adjacent phrases sound too redundant. Maybe, I could even delete the following line completely, couldn't I?

[ "while keeping featuring for the Primavera squad in the national league and in the UEFA Youth League" ]

- I've kept the Transfermarkt quote, as well, because it doesn't refer to the player's profile; it's rather a full article on him, written as part of a yearly series they publish on the site's news section. Is it OK, or should I remove it anyway?

- Actually, there's already a good amount of articles about him: apart from The Guardian, La Gazzetta dello Sport and Olé, which are all already included in the references, I've also noticed some articles from Eurosport and (hopefully) other reliable sources. I'd probably have to trim some of the other current citations, though...

Let me know what you think about it! Oltrepier (talk) 10:39, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

That Trasfermarkt looks like to be a blog, so no. Dr Salvus 11:41, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

@Dr Salvus Right, I've just removed that link entirely. Oltrepier (talk) 12:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Promoting. Dr Salvus 16:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC)