Talk:Vaiphei people

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Manipur Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Manipur (assessed as Low-importance).

Message 1

In Wiki, the writer mentioned that Khawvaiphei within the bracket of Phaiza. Actually, the writer misunderstood. Moreover, Khawvaiphei and Phaiza village is not same at all. Phaiza is one of the oldest villages of the Suantak clans. My great grandfathers were brought up in Phaiza in the olden days. Even, my grandfathers, had never mentioned that Khawvaiphei is Phaiza or vice-versa. - Mr Lalbawi Suantak, Saiha, M.Z.

I'm pinning it back!--86.29.138.161 (talk) 03:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article stubbed

I've stubbed the article. However, anyone interested can use ref 2, Bleeding Manipur to expand. A good part of the book is available via the link.-SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 05:51, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced revision

See the unreferenced revision here. Shii (tock) 02:26, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: www.indianetzone.com/8/vaiphei_tribe.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 13:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]