Talk:Vagrant (software)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vagrant (software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as High-importance).

Closed-source components

HashiCorp claims, "Vagrant remains and always will be a liberally licensed open source project".[1] But the Vagrant installer for Windows includes the useful closed-source "Vagrant Share"[2] add-on. And, to use that installer, you must agree to Vagrant Share's EULA[3] and you must install Vagrant Share.

Even once it's installed, you don't have to use Vagrant Share. If you don't want to use it, simply don't run the vagrant share command.

How should we describe Vagrant? One option is to describe it as "mixed proprietary and open-source", similar to how we describe PDFCreator. I have done so for now, but I am not sure that it's the best choice.

What are your thoughts?

Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should just write what it says in the licence:

Vagrant core is licenced under a MIT licence;
the "Vagrant Share" component for windows is proprietary.

The way the installer works does not change the licencing terms of the source code.

89.97.108.159 (talk) 09:02, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second sentence (Solved)

The core idea behind it lies in the fact ...

This is no way to commence the second sentence of the lead. Besides the sophomoric diction, it's hard to see how this leads into encyclopedic claims. — MaxEnt 18:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Already solved.Tech201805 (talk)

Abandoned user draft

Please would an interested editor assess the material added at User:Shrenujgandhi/Vagrant, incorporate what is useful, blank the page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done?

Ditto with User:Aslingwa/Vagrants. – Fayenatic London 21:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Viagrunts fork

The provided Github link now returns 404. Did it die? 188.190.73.30 (talk) 22:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]