Talk:Vaan (Final Fantasy)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 03:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

G'day, mates! I am going to take a look at this article and see if there's any problems. Meanwhile, here's my first impression on the articles:

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The prose is well-written.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   I have a doubt about the FF Shrine interview. The original source is at IGN, so you may want to replace that.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Replaced reference.Tintor2 (talk) 13:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and made a pass on it. Nice work, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:11, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.Tintor2 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)