Talk:VWorker

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hangon

Not only is vWorker the topic of the Entrepreneur article referenced, its been on the Inc. 5000 three times and was mentioned on the MSNBC article. There are also the many, many media listings on their web site. [1] Notability is clear here. Zoningviolation (talk) 18:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality dispute

Large parts of the article read basically as advertising, and while there are some references to other sources, at the present time, 10 out of 20 "references" lead to domains obviously related to vWorker itself, and some 14 out of 20 "external links" are more or less directly related to vWorker. The article should either be substantially rewritten (I do not believe there are any few single points that can be addressed to put the text in NPOV form), or third party references should be used in addition to or in place of those currently mentioned in order to establish proper verifiability. Mkjo (talk) 19:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why this page is still alive

As we all know this company has merged with other now they don't have web platform with same name Why this page still alive ¿ Sumitmpsd (talk) 09:53, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Freelancer.com with VWorker

On November 19, 2012, Freelancer acquired vWorker Light2021 (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge, as the pre-merge history of vWorker, a pioneer in its field, is worthy of distinct coverage; the article is adequately referenced. Note that there is no obligation to merge the pages because the companies themselves have merged. Klbrain (talk) 18:15, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing; uncontested opposition and no support. Klbrain (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]