Talk:VMix

Untitled

Trying to plant the seeds of an article here. I'm not sure what company the previously deleted article was referring to, but today, vMix is one of the most notable software vision switchers on the market. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Probablymichael (talk • contribs) 12:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The previous article was about the company behind vmix.com, but described it as a web service and did not mention any standalone software. Still, I am not convinced that we should have an article about this. (Reliable sources would help). —Kusma (t·c) 20:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to get more sources, admittedly this is a poor stub, and I'm not the one to write it. But the suggestion that it's not worth an article is off-base I think, look to Wirecast and Open Broadcaster Software. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Probablymichael (talk • contribs) 16:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to make it clear that the company whose platform used to reside at vmix.com has to relation to this software, they simply previously owned this domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Probablymichael (talk • contribs) 16:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes, established a few sources, cleaned things up, added more info and specifications. Will come back soon to expand further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Probablymichael (talk • contribs) 17:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering what further steps should be taken to move towards removing the nobility message? I've established several reputable sources. Probablymichael (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]