Talk:VIA Nano

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the VIA Nano article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old discussions

"94M-transistor" --Emesee (talk) 19:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TDP

What is TDP, because 25 watt really sound high. and the papers on hardocp do not support this value. :Leuk he (talk) 08:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard this is the TDP at 2.0 GHz, which is pretty good. At 1.0 Ghz the TDP is prob. around 3-5 watts (75.121.149.103 (talk) 04:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Launch date

Anyone got a credible report of a launch date or specific products using the processor family? MrZaius^talk 06:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Has anyone actually seen a product FOR SALE in the wild that features this processor? It's suppose to have been out for almost a year now!! Softest launch EVAR.Evil Genius (talk) 08:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Isaiah vs. Nano

From reading their literature, it looks like Isaiah is not a code name, but is the official name of their instruction set architecture (ISAiah, get it?), and Nano is the first implementation of this ISA. Can anyone confirm or deny?--NapoliRoma (talk) 04:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improved vista windows support in beta sp 2

http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/12/02/Microsoft_offers_service_pack_beta_for_Vista_Windows_Server_2008_1.html Andries (talk) 20:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ECC-Support?

Does this CPU really have ECC-Support. In all research I've done, Wikipedia is the only source claiming this… —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.128.108.207 (talk) 22:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At a glance????

Something drives me nuts about asshole marketeers who break Wikipedia's credibility by inserting random pieces of text from marketing brochures in a purely scientific article. Would you see Encyclopedia Britannica describe the features of say, the RBMK nuclear reactor using this stupid marketing buzzphrase? Changed it to "features". Or "core features", "basic features" whatever.

Will it run Linux and 64-bit iForth for 64-bit AI?

64-bit iForth has just been released for Windows and Linux and for Intel and AMD 64-bit CPU chips. The Usenet newsgroup comp.lang.forth on 8 October 2009 has the announcement by Marcel Hendrix, but it is unclear which CPUs will actually run iForth and also be commercially available (preferably on a netbook or laptop). The open-source AI project MindForth has been exclusively Windows 32-bit for ten years and needs to up-migrate to 64-bit and to Linux with iForth. The article ought to include what availability there is for the CPU chip and in what commercial products. Posted by 67.150.171.147 (talk) 13:33, 22 October 2009 (UTC) Mentifex[reply]