Talk:Víðarr

Víðarr has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 11, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Norse history and culture High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norse history and culture, a WikiProject related to all activities of the North Germanic peoples, both in Scandinavia and abroad, prior to the formation of the Kalmar Union in 1397. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Norse history and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Norse history and cultureNorse history and culture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Landviði

This 'Landviði' name which comes out of the blue in the article might make someone curious. It's actually based on the Grímnismál stanza. Take a look at the manuscript text: [1]

You can see the stanza, it starts 12 lines from the bottom up: "Hrisi vex & ok há grasi viþars land.viði" The syntax is a bit tricky here and some early commentators took Landviði to be the name of Víðarr's dwelling place. I think that's no longer a fashionable theory. Haukur (talk) 22:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Víðarr 174.166.222.255 (talk) 20:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Víðarr/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The lead is a bit short. Maybe mention briefly the theories in the lead. (I know it isn't easy to balance things, but the lead was just a little short). In this sentence "Ægir invites the gods to come to his hall in numbers in Germanic paganism months." the syntax of "three" and "numbers in Germanic paganism" are the wrong way around in the link. One really picky thing (to closer perfect the article, and by far a GA requirement): when using a range in for instance a page citation, use the endash (–), not the hyphen (-). You can access the endash from the "insert" line under the text box when editing. Otherwise—as always—a well written, comprehensive and engaging text.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
A few picky things to address before this "on hold" is changed to a "pass". Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Arsenikk, Thanks for the kind words! I believe the changes you've requested have been put in place? Odd that I missed the "numbers in Germanic paganism" issue! :bloodofox: (talk) 17:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Passed. Arsenikk ^(talk) 17:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name

I cannot help but find it overly, and unnecessarily, pedantic to spell the name Víðarr. I am well aware this is the original spelling, but if one is to adhere to that rule, one might as well change Tuscany to Tusculanum, York to Jorvik (or even: Euboracium), and Egypt to Hat-ka-Ptah.

I propose changing Víðarr to Vidar (which is the form in almost every other language), or even Vidarr. --Sparviere (talk) 15:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the guideline reflecting the consensus we have reached on English Wikipedia about cases like these: Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(Norse_mythology)#Standard_spelling. This is a separate convention created only as a guideline for Old Norse names, so it is irrelevant what the editors working on Tuscany and those other examples do. –Holt (T•C) 14:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I acquiesce. However, I still find it pedantic.

--Sparviere (talk) 21:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But this violates the rules of wikipedia.188.172.108.7 (talk) 12:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English Wiki

English wiki.

í-not English.

ð-Not English.

So where are we then?112.198.79.107 (talk) 13:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read this: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Norse mythology). :bloodofox: (talk) 20:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not rules. They are a request. A request that violates the rules of wikipedia.188.172.108.164 (talk) 11:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But this violates the rules of wikipedia.188.172.108.7 (talk) 12:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Víðarr stronger than Þórr?

Þórr is of course stated to be the strongest god while Víðarr is second. But I honestly feel like Víðarr might be the strongest naturally, while Þórr is only the strongest when using his strength enhancing belt, Megingjörð. 2603:6011:F83F:5015:8456:2A2F:CF34:19DF (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]