Jump to content

Talk:Vásquez House

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit Request - Add sourcing

[edit]

  • Add under the History section, please add the following citation after the 1st paragraph to support statement about the house being called the Vásquez Adobe, being owned by the mother Vásquez, purchased in the 1830s, and went through renovations.[1]

References

  1. ^ Whitehurst, Patrick (2019). Haunted Monterey County. Haunted America. pp. 36–37. Retrieved 2024-08-04.

Greg Henderson (talk) 03:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done
This does not seem like a reliable source: Haunted America (publisher) is a subsidiary of Arcadia Publishing which is a disputed source as to reliability and quality. It's not a serious history imprint - they publish scores of FRINGE topics and ghost-story pulp-history such as Ghosts of Salem: The Haunts of the Witch City and the like [1], Haunted Florida Love Stories [2], etc. Their website has 13 pages of dozens of books of sub-par quality. Netherzone (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Discussion ongoing...

  • Netherzone, OK, how about this one:
  • Add under the History section, please add the following citation after the 1st paragraph to support statement about Tiburcio Vásquez and the house that is named Vásquez House.[1]

References

  1. ^ Powers, Laura Bride (1934-01-01). Old Monterey California's Adobe Capital. San Carlos Press. pp. 259–261. Retrieved 2024-08-05.

Greg Henderson (talk) 15:34, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request - Remove proposed deletion/dated tag

[edit]
  • Go to the article Vásquez House and click on edit.
  • Remove the following text at the top of the page being proposed for deletion:
    • Remove the "proposed deletion|concern=concern"

Note: This article is about a California Historical Landmark # 351, and per WP:GEOFEAT is presumed to be notable. Greg Henderson (talk) 03:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now.
Not sure that a blocked editor can submit an edit request for a prod removal. Netherzone (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You misinterpreted the SNG, which reads (with emphasis added by me) "Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable.". Recognition at a state or city level is not considered a national level. Graywalls (talk) 06:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Greghenderson2006:, please allow a moment while I try to figure out whether I'm obliged to comply with the request. Graywalls (talk) 07:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Graywalls If I read Wikipedia:PROXYING right, then you are only allowed to make the edit if you are able to show that the changes are productive and have independent reasons for making such edits. Nobody (talk) 09:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Graywalls you are welcome to, but you are not obliged to. No editor has to act on any edit request. If you believe the PROD was in error, you're welcome to remove it, send it for AfD or any action yu think best. cc@Netherzone Star Mississippi 12:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Discussion ongoing...

Greg Henderson (talk) 15:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am not removing it, but I'm leaving this open. The building is not listed on a national level historical register and the coverage on it appears to fall short of GNG. I've done a cursory good faith WP:BEFORE, check but I'm not taking time to do an exhaustive search. In the interest of saving community time rather than taking it to AfD with a predictable result, I PROD it. If other editors without enticement from Greg feel PROD should be removed, then they're free to remove it, just as anyone else, including myself is free to AfD it after that. Graywalls (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Necrothesp: Thanks for removing the proposed deletion tag. I appreciate it. Greg Henderson (talk) 14:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Request - Add citation about landmark

[edit]

  • Under Historic preservation, please add the following citation at the end of the 1st paragraph:
    • "California historical landmarks". Sacramento, California: California State Parks. 1996. p. 139. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
    • Note: This citation adds reference to Landmark no., name of building, owner, street and state.

Greg Henderson (talk) 15:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]