Talk:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article uses leading or suggestive language

This article uses language that imposes a personal viewpoint on the facts under discussion.

For instance: ". . . filed a lawsuit against the school on his behalf along with another . . . student whose speech had been similarly stifled . . ."

And again, here: " . . . whose right to freedom of speech have been suppressed . . . "

The case in question, which has not yet been decided, is intended to determine whether or not the plaintiff's freedom of speech was infringed upon. The article as written falsely implies that a legal decision has been reached in the plaintiff's favor, when the case has not even been heard yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLeeHolcomb (talk • contribs)

All sources describing the case stated that the student's rights were infringed by the original speech rules the schools had, but when those were changed, in addition to his graduation, those claims were rendered moot. It is a question of whether the student should be awarded nominal damages to validate that his rights had been violated originally. --Masem (t) 14:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

800k legal settlement, New Wrinkle in the Case

This just happened:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/after-supreme-court-win-christian-students-accept-monetary-settlement-from-college-that-violated-their-free-speech-rights_4557932.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2610:148:1F02:7000:B568:A47E:8DE7:74FE (talk) 06:33, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]