Talk:Uzbekistan at the 2014 Winter Paralympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Rephrase this sentence: " Yevgeniy Slepov completed all three runs, he posted his two best times on runs 1 and 3.". Rewritten.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Expand the intro to include results Done
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Can you try to figure out why Ramil Gayazov was DQ'ed? One translated source made it seem like he didn't make it to the end of the run. Try looking through whatever local Google Uzbekistan uses.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Flag is properly tagged
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No images found on Commons for this
	7. Overall assessment.

Include this as an external link?

Added. Found the disqualification reason, he missed gate 43. I knew that was what it had to be, but never had been able to find it... All other responses inline. Kees08 ping!

Kees08 reping! This time with a signature to make it work, even! Courcelles (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]