Talk:Uyarndha Manithan/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 06:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Lede
- "The film's soundtrack and background score were composed by M. S. Viswanathan, while the lyrics for the film's" -you can remove both instances of "film's"
- Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- "with the release prints being 4,591 m (15,062 ft) long" -no need to mention in lede.
- Done I followed the ledes of other GAs I had done but I have nevertheless removed it as per your suggestion. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- It would be OK ro mention it in discussing production, but I think it looks a bit awkward to say it on release.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: I have written it in the production section. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- What I meant was if there was a bit mentioning the production of the film in the lede you could mention it within that, but as there isn't don't worry.
- @Dr. Blofeld: I have written it in the production section. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:17, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- It would be OK ro mention it in discussing production, but I think it looks a bit awkward to say it on release.♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Plot
- "to retain any job that he gets selected" -awkward, try just "to retain a job".
- Done written as "to retain any job". Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- "teir love"
- Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- "Raju throws Sathyamurthy out of Raju's house despite Sathyamurthy proclaiming his innocence. "- add comma after house.
- Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Production
- "a deicision" -typo :-)
- Done as asked. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 07:26, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
I took care of the rest.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Just added it to the GA film list after Thunderbirds Are Go LOL. who'd have thought!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:05, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Haha. Thank you once again for conducting the review. It was very swift and smooth as well. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 08:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, you caught me at the right time on this, first thing in the morning, and in some of the past reviews I had a ton of FA reviews and peer reviews to do or was just really busy, hence the delay. Keep up the good work, let me know when you want another reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Most definitely, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 08:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, you caught me at the right time on this, first thing in the morning, and in some of the past reviews I had a ton of FA reviews and peer reviews to do or was just really busy, hence the delay. Keep up the good work, let me know when you want another reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)