Jump to content

Talk:Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Improve the non-free use rationale of the poster with this template.
  • Don't use small font in the infobox per MOS:SMALLFONT.
  • Resolve the issue with the "[pronunciation?]" tag in the first sentence.
  • "TV series" → "television series"
  • "was released" → "premiered"
  • Try moving some references here to #Production per MOS:TVLEAD.
  • Add (2014–2019) after Diriliş: Ertuğrul.
  • "why the TV series is gaining" → "why the television series gained"
  • I'm not sure whether the first part of the sentence beginning with "One of the reasons" is necessary (I would remove it).
  • The second mention of Emre Konuk should just be Konuk.

Synopsis and cast

[edit]
  • These sections look great.

Episodes

[edit]
  • The article titled "List of Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu episodes" should not exist [yet]. Merge it back into this article per MOS:TVSPLIT, which states that "it would take between 50 and 60 episodes to warrant separating those summaries off the main page to an List of Episodes page."
  • After doing so, add episode summaries for every episode that has aired so far (in your own words).

Production

[edit]
  • I don't believe the quote block template is necessary, so I suggest adding it instead to the end of the sentence.
  • "show. In which, Gülsoy said" → "show, in which Gülsoy said"
  • "casted" → "cast"
  • Remove "skilfully" (not a neutral word).

Reception

[edit]
  • Add a "Critical response" header/subsection.
  • Expand this section with the help of WP:RECEPTION.
  • "gaining popularity for the casting of famous actors" is trivial. Most shows get popular due to the actors in them so it's not that important.
  • Don't use small font in the table per MOS:SMALLFONT.

References

[edit]
  • Archive all archivable sources (use this tool first and then try adding them manually).
  • I'm not sure whether "fav10" is a reliable source, so I would suggest finding replacements.
  • A lot of sources are missing authors/websites/dates so try retrieving that information.
  • In the "|website=" parameter, try finding an official title instead of inserting an actual link (ex. www.gazetevatan.comGazete Vatan)

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • Some Dude From North Carolina, firstly, I don't know where to comment so please move this to the appropriate area if necessary. I can't find much information at all for a critical response section. I checked almost every website (Hürriyet, Sözcü, etc.) but they're either plot summaries or an actor's (or the person a character is historically based on) biography. Is this section absolutely necessary? Limorina (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Limorina: The subsection is necessary, but what you have now is fine. Just add a header and take care of the rest of my suggestions and/or add comments. When you do, ping me again so I can take a look at your progress. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some Dude From North Carolina, I've done most of the things you have told me to do. I just have to date the citations. It's a bit hard trying to find plot summaries and I don't know if I can do it in two days. The author information for the citations is pretty unclear too for some of them. Limorina (talk) 20:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Limorina: No worries! Since most of my suggestions have been already been addressed, I am passing the article (just try to remove references from the lead already mentioned in other sections per MOS:LEAD). Great work! Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]