Talk:Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Improve the non-free use rationale of the poster with this template.
- Don't use small font in the infobox per MOS:SMALLFONT.
- Resolve the issue with the "[pronunciation?]" tag in the first sentence.
- "TV series" → "television series"
- "was released" → "premiered"
- Try moving some references here to #Production per MOS:TVLEAD.
- Add (2014–2019) after Diriliş: Ertuğrul.
- "why the TV series is gaining" → "why the television series gained"
- I'm not sure whether the first part of the sentence beginning with "One of the reasons" is necessary (I would remove it).
- The second mention of Emre Konuk should just be Konuk.
Synopsis and cast
[edit]- These sections look great.
Episodes
[edit]- The article titled "List of Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu episodes" should not exist [yet]. Merge it back into this article per MOS:TVSPLIT, which states that "it would take between 50 and 60 episodes to warrant separating those summaries off the main page to an List of Episodes page."
- After doing so, add episode summaries for every episode that has aired so far (in your own words).
Production
[edit]- I don't believe the quote block template is necessary, so I suggest adding it instead to the end of the sentence.
- "show. In which, Gülsoy said" → "show, in which Gülsoy said"
- "casted" → "cast"
- Remove "skilfully" (not a neutral word).
Reception
[edit]- Add a "Critical response" header/subsection.
- Expand this section with the help of WP:RECEPTION.
- "gaining popularity for the casting of famous actors" is trivial. Most shows get popular due to the actors in them so it's not that important.
- Don't use small font in the table per MOS:SMALLFONT.
References
[edit]- Archive all archivable sources (use this tool first and then try adding them manually).
- I'm not sure whether "fav10" is a reliable source, so I would suggest finding replacements.
- A lot of sources are missing authors/websites/dates so try retrieving that information.
- In the "|website=" parameter, try finding an official title instead of inserting an actual link (ex. www.gazetevatan.com → Gazete Vatan)
Progress
[edit]GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
[edit]- Some Dude From North Carolina, firstly, I don't know where to comment so please move this to the appropriate area if necessary. I can't find much information at all for a critical response section. I checked almost every website (Hürriyet, Sözcü, etc.) but they're either plot summaries or an actor's (or the person a character is historically based on) biography. Is this section absolutely necessary? Limorina (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Limorina: The subsection is necessary, but what you have now is fine. Just add a header and take care of the rest of my suggestions and/or add comments. When you do, ping me again so I can take a look at your progress. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Some Dude From North Carolina, I've done most of the things you have told me to do. I just have to date the citations. It's a bit hard trying to find plot summaries and I don't know if I can do it in two days. The author information for the citations is pretty unclear too for some of them. Limorina (talk) 20:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Limorina: No worries! Since most of my suggestions have been already been addressed, I am passing the article (just try to remove references from the lead already mentioned in other sections per MOS:LEAD). Great work! Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Some Dude From North Carolina, I've done most of the things you have told me to do. I just have to date the citations. It's a bit hard trying to find plot summaries and I don't know if I can do it in two days. The author information for the citations is pretty unclear too for some of them. Limorina (talk) 20:22, 26 March 2021 (UTC)