Talk:Utrecht Te Deum and Jubilate
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Utrecht Te Deum and Jubilate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Utrecht Te Deum and Jubilate appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 February 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Abbreviations
[edit]This box still has abbreviations despite the consensus now to use them. Should they simply be deleted? --Kleinzach 02:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- We are still developing an article on the instruments of the Baroque period. Why change now and then again when that is good enough? I don't think any reader is hurt by an abbreviation he may not understand. - In some infoboxes the abbreviations were replaced by simply saying "instruments", - I don't see how that is any better. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Kleinzach, maybe spell out the instruments, or give number of instrumental parts? Nikkimaria (talk) 22:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)