Talk:Utah State Route 103/GA1
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- There is some WP:OVERLINKing at work here. All of the references do not need links to UDOT. Only the first link needs it. Also, there needs to be a WP:NBSP between 22,525 and cars.
Done --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 01:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- There is some WP:OVERLINKing at work here. All of the references do not need links to UDOT. Only the first link needs it. Also, there needs to be a WP:NBSP between 22,525 and cars.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Broad enough for .225 miles of highway that is only 43 years old.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No photos. I'd like to see something to illustrate the article at some point.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Some minor fixes and it will pass.
- Pass/Fail:
Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Issues fixed and passed Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)