Talk:Use Somebody
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was a past Alternative Music Collaboration of the Week! You can view other past collaborations in the archive. |
Critical Reception
[edit]How do we feel about the opinion of the fans that the band is a sellout being included here without a genuine citation? The citation listed is to the Grammy Awards announcement, not anything connected to a backlash against the band. Maybe I missed something with the cites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trentsketch (talk • contribs) 10:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Genre
[edit]i don't think this song is power pop, i believe that is heartland rock but i would like a second opinion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.165.172.99 (talk) 05:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Those genres aren't cited, anyway. If I figure out how to tag something for that in the next five minutes I might do it. 24.131.254.74 (talk) 00:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Doc Strange removed my citation tag for the Alternative rock genre, stating that "it IS by an alternative rock band." While I don't contest that KoL is Alt Rock, does that automatically mean that Use Somebody is Alt Rock and that Alt Rock can be listed as a genre without a citation? Obv I don't care enough to get into an edit war over it, and I'm very new to Wikipedia so if someone with more experience has a viewpoint on the matter take a look. --67.171.65.37 (talk) 22:12, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
YouTube links
[edit]There are several YouTube links in the references section, are these allowed? Stonemason89 (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
3xPlatinum??? I think not...
[edit]Until the RIAA website says so, its not certified 3x Platinum, I see its only 1x Platinum, or just Platinum. Have a look here.. The Man Who Needs No Introduction! (talk) 02:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Use Somebody. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5o3D4adtB?url=http://www.aumreport.com/amr100.html to http://www.aumreport.com/amr100.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150625193534/https://music.yahoo.com/photos/top-selling-rock-songs-1422920108-slideshow/journey-photo-1423078622830.html to https://music.yahoo.com/photos/top-selling-rock-songs-1422920108-slideshow/journey-photo-1423078622830.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100506023956/http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)