Talk:Usain Bolt/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Grear work! I don't think the article is "dry" only because there's no personal drama, this piece is incredibly detailed and obviously thoroughly researched. My only comment is that on the "Rising" section you mention the "JAAA" for the first time, it should be stated what the acronym stands for. Thanks for your work. --Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 13:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the review. The JAAA is already spelled out and linked at the end of the early competitions section. Thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out, I spent hours going over the article and yet I couldn't find what JAAA meant. Again, thanks for your work.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 17:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article has progressed so much from when I first set eyes on it, after the 100 m final ^_^. A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 16:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]