Talk:Urvi (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 23 March 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved(non-admin closure) Kostas20142 (talk) 18:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urvi (film) → Urvi – No need for disambiguation per WP:PRECISION BOVINEBOY2008 14:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urvi has an article, she is a Hindu goddess. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Bovineboy2008 and In ictu oculi: Queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Urvi redirects to the goddess who already has an article. Urvi (film) is just named after the goddess. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – malformed proposal, as the target is taken. Dicklyon (talk) 04:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.