Talk:Urmila
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 4 January 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 14:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Urmila (Ramayana) → Urmila – Ramayana word not needed -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Not clear - if removing (Ramayana) is an advantage, and Urmila is the primary topic in books, then the Urmila dab page would perhaps be moved to Urmila (name). In ictu oculi (talk) 22:05, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose no rationale provided for deleting the destination and merging it into a hatnote here. No rationale provided on why the disambiguator is not needed. So, this move request fails at having a rationale, since a different topic exists at the destination. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:43, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Urmila was originally a redirect to Urmila (Ramayana) before I added another link to it and converted it into a disambig. But later I noticed that [[Urmila (disambiguation) already exists. Further all other Urmila have a second or last name attached in the title itself except Urmila (Ramayana). So I proposed moving Urmila (Ramayana) to Urmila. Please check edit histories of relevant pages. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support - it is an obvious primary use, unless there is someone now better known than the character in the Ramayana. Imc (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support per IMC. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:25, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.