Talk:Uranium in Western Australia

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Uranium in Western Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Not in citation given - ANAWA

I've tagged this statement:

The uranium mining projects in Western Australia have attracted opposition from organisations such as the Anti-Nuclear Alliance of Western Australia, which have attempted to put a hold on them before they reach active mining stage

as {{failedverification}} because the reference [1] does not state that ANAWA has "attempted to put a hold" on uranium mining projects. The site does encourage others to "Say No to Toro", but encouraging others to say "No" to a single mine is not the same as "trying to stop" mining projects (plural). Can we find reference that directly supports the statement? Or should we reword the statement to match the reference more accurately? Mitch Ames (talk) 12:48, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed -- re-written and more sources added. Johnfos (talk) 00:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]