Talk:Upper gastrointestinal series

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Upper gastrointestinal series.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Hatnote for barium meal test

Would the following hatnote be appropriate: For the "barium meal test" in espionage, see Canary trap.

(It's not entirely clear to what extent the WP:Hatnote style guideline sanctions the use of quotation marks. Obviously, this would make use of {{for}}.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 00:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I support the proposed hatnote. It could help some users but would not harm the rest—and that's the same standard by which all hatnotes are judged. In my view, finding fault with it would be overly whiny. Quercus solaris (talk) 03:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. The question remains whether the quotation marks are appropriate; my original instinct was that they are not, but I included them here for clarity. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 06:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]