Talk:Upper West Side Story/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Wikilink "Third season" in the lead

   Sources aren't need in the lead. I'd move [1] to "Production" and [2] down to the "Ratings" section

   The first half of the production section is unsourced (who wrote it, how many they've written, etc.). Add a reliable source that confirms all of that. Also, do you have a citation to state who directed what? Maybe just cite the episode itself

   The lead mentions that the episode features "many themes of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, and contains various allusions to Shakespearean and Victorian-era literature, however, this is not explained or even mentioned in the production section. Please expand this section quite a bit and add citations.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Italicize A.V. Club in Refs. 1 and 7

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

On hold for seven days to straighten out the issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks good! I pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)