Talk:Upland, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Unsourced

Is there any proof to support this statement?

Other highlights of Upland include Upland High School (featured on 60 Minutes in the mid-1980s as an example of suburban high schools with terrible drug problems)

I've heard this claim before and always felt it was apocryphal. Whoville 22:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any proof to support this statement?

One such native resident, Taryn Turney, has been seen in numerous contemporary Broadway hits such as RENT, Wicked, Avenue Q and a staged reading of The Wild Party.

I know this person and they have never been on broadway.

Schools

Seeing that someone added a section for Upland schools but only included a handful of schools to their list, I added all schools from the Upland School District. This list is still incomplete, as it does not include any private schools. Jer the linear 07:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Marijuana

Tcccfriends: Whether or not medical marijuana is a local political issue, it is irrelevant regardless. Local current events do not belong in an encyclopedia article unless they lead to some greater significance. As of yet, this ban's impact is too early to determine. Furthermore, it is uncited. Please stop vandalizing the page. jer the linear 00:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These edits are currently being discussed on Tcccfriends's talk page.

Are this person's edits effectively a violation of 3RR? Jddphd 02:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. jer the linear 04:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As were yours, but I see you failed to mention this. Is there a double standard for trolls such as Jerdobias?Tcccfriends 17:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tccc, Even though your troll comment is spectacularly witty, please keep in mind the Wiki Policy regarding unnacceptable talk page behavior, specifically as it relates to personal attacks. Thanks (by the way, if you look at my contributions page, you can easily determine that my contribution to Wikipedia is far beyond that of a troll, I've had substantial page edits and entry creations. RVV'ing your misedits is hardly trolling). jer the linear 04:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find if interesting that Jerdobias and jer the the linear are the same person. Is the phrase sock puppet allowed here?Tcccfriends 01:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you don't have a solid understanding of how wikipedia signatures work. I'll be happy to explain. jer the linear is my signature. it is the SAME account as Jerdobias. It is not a second account pretending to be a different person. Therefore, it is not a sockpuppet. In fact, my signature, as do ALL of our signatures, actually WikiLinks to my userpage, to help ease the confusion. Glad I could clear that up. Anyway, I'm sorry that you don't have consensus and your that your plan failed, but it's not that big of a deal. Let's move on. jer the linear 01:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)My plan failed? Oh, I don't think so.Tcccfriends 08:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]