Jump to content

Talk:Up All Night (One Direction album)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (public) (talk · contribs) 08:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review. Thine Antique Pen (public) 08:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  • Ref 116 needs the dashes removed from it to be consistent with the other references. Also, change the "Direction, One" to "One Direction".
  • Ref 117 needs the dashes removed from it to be consistent with the other references.
Both done, I have removed One Direction from author don't know how it go there AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Per toolserver.

Done, some IP came and linked to everything for a reason- delinked and disambiguated for More Than This. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Have replaced all dead refs with new ones. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Once I'm done, you can. I'll drop you a line when I am. Thine Antique Pen (public) 15:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Looks good, no issues. All content in the lead is contained in the article. Thine Antique Pen (public) 15:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Background

[edit]

"to an £2 million" -> "to a £2 million" Thine Antique Pen (public) 15:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to note, I won't be able to correct queries until Friday 17 August 2012. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance

[edit]

Random short sentence at the end, please include somewhere else. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everything else

[edit]

Everything else looks good, and seems to be of GA quality. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Good work! Passed. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]