Talk:Unused New York City Subway service labels

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

Unwarranted label placements

Please do not use labels such as "fact" and "weasel" without specific reference to WHAT you think is factish or weasley and how it may be resolved. It's easy to place labels but a lot more work to place accurate information. In the case of the speculation about Culver="P" the article explicitely says this is a speculation. I will remove the "Y" reference for 2nd Avenue because it is both unsourced and obviously hasn't happened, since the MTA has officially designated the 2nd Avenue service as "T". -- Cecropia 16:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Division

Soon, 8,9,10,11,12 And 13 Trains Will Be Used For Rush Hour 24.47.16.249 (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of sources for the two-digit bullets

I found that list confusing, because the sources listed are placed not after the existence of the bullet, but after the (I think) inference that we can guess at the intended route for those bullets. That's the information I thought the source was being used for when I removed the sources - I suggest we either move the sources back to be next to the thing they are referring to, and explain explicitly why there's an assumption about what trunk lines they're intended for - which is an assumption I've seen in a lot of pages with no solid references to really back up the multiple interpretations on varying articles. Thoughts? Tduk (talk) 14:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]