Talk:Until We Have Faces

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christian music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Track listing

There no need to have the exclusive bonus track separated. There's note to indicate that it's an iTunes-exclusive track and there's even a reference to that. To have it as a collapsed, separated track listing doesn't benefit the reader. Please explain why it should exist. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name Inspiration

On their website RED talks about C.S. Lewis as an inspiration, but I've yet to find any reference to taking the album's name from his novel. If there are no objections, I'll give the author a month to come up with a source for that claim. After that, I think it's best to remove it as heresay. Statarius (talk) http://redmusiconline.com/about —Preceding unsigned comment added by Statarius (talk • contribs) 03:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Might want to check out this interview site when you get a chance...states pretty clearly the novel's influence on the album. http://copiousnotes.bloginky.com/2011/03/11/red-hot-at-winter-jam/#more-8957 Bnhwillard (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel/Reception

I believe these sections (Personal and Reception) need to be edited heavily and shortened. At the present moment they are too long and the reader will get lost looking at them. Having sections that long are just filler and need to be more concisely written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:2539:3709:3d61:67db:9807:4a8e (talk • contribs) 05:20, 13 01 2013 (UTC)

What do you propose to remove from the reception section? I suppose non-notable review sites could be removed, alternately, reducing the space given to each review or combining them would help. However, they're all fairly brief already.

As for the personnel section, again what would you suggest removing? I think it's perfectly fine the way it is since it lists the personnel involved in recording the album.

Both sections are standard and acceptable for any album article. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Single notability

All of the singles after "Faceless" and "Feed the Machine" are only notable because they charted. They consist of two sentences, a tracklist, and a chart. Being very short pages, I'm suggesting redirecting those ones to the album. I'd like to hear what everyone thinks. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Over a month and nobody has said anything. I have noticed these articles were created by a devious and now-blocked sockpuppeteer who used to genre war and just plain write false info and create single pages for those which had no right to have individual articles. All these pages remain short except "Lie to Me," and I'm redirecting the rest, as they have been stubs for nine months. DannyMusicEditor (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]