Talk:Unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine

On 13 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Asymmetric dimethylhydrazine. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Production process

Could somebod add a "Production Process" section, please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.37.166 (talk) 03:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mil-spec Ref

I've updated the military specification for UDMH with a reference and link. Bosef1 (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

link 3 to Cornell is dead

The link for UDMH contaminating apple juice needs to be fixed.

http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/issues/intolrisks.html goes to a 404 page

The requested URL /issues/intolrisks.html was not found on this server. Apache/2.2.3 (Debian) DAV/2 mod_python/3.2.10 Python/2.4.4 PHP/4.4.4-8+etch6 mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8 Server at pmep.cce.cornell.edu Port 80

74.225.15.60 (talk) 19:15, 10 October 2011 (UTC)David[reply]

unsymmetrical vs asymmetrical

Can anyone shed light on why the name is unsymmetrical and not the generally more standard asymmetrical? Sbreheny (talk) 07:35, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

North Korean rockets

The New York Times has an article about North Korea's use of UDMH in its rockets. It points out that the substance is very toxic and very difficult to use safely as a fuel. It also points to a story about a 1960 rocket explosion in the Soviet Union (now the Baikonur complex in Kazakhstan) which killed an estimated 150 people. That led them to reduce their use of UDMH. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/world/asia/north-korea-rocket-fuel-missiles.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news Isdnip (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket fuels, by definition, are dangerous materials, so no news there. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030207030254/http://www.astronautix.com/props/n2o4udmh.htm to http://www.astronautix.com/props/n2o4udmh.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine → Asymmetric dimethylhydrazine – Unsymmetrical->Asymmetric: More standard term Jeaucques Quœure (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Chemicals has been notified of this discussion. Bensci54 (talk) 20:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: This is what it is called - it isn't than a name that wikipedia has invented. The reason for the odd choice is actually to reduce confusion, because in chemistry 'asymmetric' very often refers to chirality and unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine isn't chiral. --Project Osprey (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. "Unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine" appears to be the much more standard term based on a search for both chemical names in SciFinder (largest database of chemical literature). Google and Google Scholar searches give the same result. Creating a redirect from Asymmetric dimethylhydrazine is probably a good idea though because that term is used. Marbletan (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as the current name is the common one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - "UDMH" is a very commonly used acronym. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 22:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.