Talk:Unomásuno/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Catrìona (talk · contribs) 11:13, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MX, I'm happy to review this article. As with previous articles, I think it would benefit from a GOCE copy edit. I would appreciate it if you could nominate it, because I have two reqs open already. Just after looking at the lede, the use of the word "deserters" jumped out - that word is strongly associated with the military. Something like "former employees" would be better. Catrìona (talk) 11:13, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Catrìona, thanks for taking on this review. I've made the suggested change and added the article to the GOCE queue. Please let me know if you need anything else from me. Just FYI, I'll be out of town (again) this weekend and will be back on Tuesday. I'll be checking my Wathchlist on my mobile and may comment here and there, but won't be able to make large edits. Cheers, MX (✉ • ✎) 14:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Catrìona. GOCE has finished copyediting this article. Just as a heads up, I will be out of town on 15 December and won't be available on Wikipedia until 1–2 January. Hopefully this week is enough time to wrap up this review. Thanks! MX (✉ • ✎) 14:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Thanks for the heads up, I'll get on it right away! Catrìona (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Background

several laws pushing for more political representation. from the rest of the paragraph, it sounds like this means "several laws liberalizing politics from government control". If that is the case, I think that wording would be more clear.

Initial success and factionalism

anti-political establishment articles I think "articles opposing the political establishment" would read better.
I think it's clear that this meets the GA criteria. I checked some of the online references and all supported the content. Catrìona (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]