Talk:University of Wisconsin–Stout/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about University of Wisconsin–Stout. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
CORRECTION
UW-Stout is a 5-year college as is the new national standard, most 4 years are now 5 years. Stout OFFERS a 4-year graduation in certain degrees that students may apply for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.76.113.51 (talk) 20:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Clean up
If you want to clean this up, you could start by putting all the facts and figures into an infobox, {{infobox University}}. See University of Wisconsin-Madison for an example. I removed the mess that an anon editor made, but linked the page they copied it from in external links. --Dual Freq 15:44, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
CORRECTION: Stout is a 5 Year University that OFFERS a 4-year graduation guarantee that students may apply for. ADDITION/CORRECTION:: Stout is Wisconsin's FIRST and ONLY designated Polytechnic University — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.76.113.51 (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:UW-Stout.gif
Image:UW-Stout.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Controversy over posters
The Firefly poster incident has drawn attention well beyond the campus (e.g., http://www.popehat.com/2011/09/26/i-swear-by-my-pretty-floral-bonnet-i-will-censor-you/, www.twincities.com/ci_19002797 -, http://journaltimes.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_c0d1cd3c-ee1f-11e0-885f-001cc4c03286.html, http://wislawjournal.com/2011/09/27/the-dark-side-a-first-amendment-showdown-at-uw-stout/, UW-S relents: http://www.weau.com/home/headlines/Posters_cause_rift_at_university_130755038.html). Is it worth including in the article? Kdammers (talk) 12:07, 25 October 2012 (UTC)