Jump to content

Talk:University of Valle/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 07:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

[edit]

From a quick couple of scan-readings, the article in general appears to be at or about GA-level, so I'm not going to quick fail it. I apppears to be comprehensive and generally well-referenced.

However, several sub-sections are totally devoid of references and are non-compliant with WP:Verify; they are:

  • Social projection, research and technological development;
  • Institutional accreditation and current standing.

There are also several unreferenced paragraphs.

I will continue the review in more depth, section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 07:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • In the first paragraph, two statements are made about the "department", but what department (this does not appeared to be explained anywhere - unless it is shorthand for Department Assembly of Valle del Cauca, if so this should be stated)?
  • Otherwise, this subsection appears to be compliant.
    • Academic consolidation and the student movement -
  • This appears to be compliant.
  • This subsection is unreferenced and non-compliant with WP:Verify.
  • This subsection is unreferenced and non-compliant with WP:Verify.

....Continuing. Pyrotec (talk) 16:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The two middle paragraphs need references.
    • San Fernando campus & La Carbonera campus -
  • These appear to be compliant.
    • Satellite campuses -
  • This subsection is unreferenced and non-compliant with WP:Verify.
  • Organization -
  • This appears to be compliant.
  • Academics -
  • This appears to be compliant generally compliant.
    • Libraries -
  • The final sentence needs verification.
  • Research -
  • This appears to be compliant.
  • Student life -
    • Activism -
  • The first paragraph is partially referenced, but the second part is unreferenced.
  • Noted people -
  • This appears to be compliant.
  • This appears to be compliant.

Pyrotec (talk) 08:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Greetings, I've revised your comments. I'll proceed to respond to some of them:

  • The word department refers to an administrative division of the country. I don't know how can I make this clearer. Maybe I should add a wikilink of the word.
  • I'll revise the citations for the two sections mentioned.

Thanks for your comments. Andremun (talk) 14:36, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and welcome back. Pyrotec (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed your comments. I hope I have addressed all of them. Regards -Andremun (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much. Pyrotec (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A comprehensive article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Mostly in Spanish, but referenced and WP:verifiable
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Mostly in Spanish, but referenced and WP:verifiable
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:University_of_Valle/GA1&oldid=316933813"