Jump to content

Talk:University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill/GA Review

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


What is a good article?

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Article: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

General

[edit]
  • Try not to make sentences so passive.
  • Avoid "it" and subst. with a proper noun/collective noun whenever possible

Introduction

[edit]

History

[edit]

Images

[edit]
  • The pictures' captions on the page don't need periods, "unless" they are complete sentences. I don't see any of pictures with captions with complete sentences in this article.  Done Artichoke2020 (talk) 16:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sports

[edit]

Traditions

[edit]
  • After important basketball victories, it has become tradition to rush downtown to Franklin Street, which the police shut to traffic.
Who rushes downtown? Students? Faculty?  Done Artichoke2020 (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Campus

[edit]

School colors

[edit]
  • You need to give dates/years when the colors were designated these colors. Since the beginning of the athletics department, doesn't work.  Done (as precisely as sources allow) Artichoke2020 (talk) 17:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scholarships

[edit]

Comments

[edit]
Went through the article. Extensive progress has been made. Thus, I am promoting this to GA. miranda 21:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.