The original article had some nice information, but I noticed several issues:
1) The article contained casual language, reflecting personal opinion and original research. (e.g. "Many students say...," "One of the most distinctive aspects...," etc. The former is an example of original (and uncited) research, while the latter is personal opinion).
2) There were several grammatical errors, misspelled words, and sentences that simply did not make sense. I've tried to clean these up a bit, though its still not perfect.
3) The structure lacked a logical progression. It frequently moved between description of the general curriculum and description of more particular aspects of the medical school program.
Hopefully these changes will help. There is still a conspicuous lack of sources cited to support the information in the article, but I'll let someone else deal with that.
BTW, I was a TA at UMKC-SOM while I was a Biology/Chemistry student at UMKC. So those are my credentials.
Mrmb6b02 (talk) 05:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
