Talk:University of Greater Manchester

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Greater Manchester High‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia: Northern Emirates / Ras al-Khaimah / United Arab Emirates Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Emirates (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Ras al-Khaimah work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	United Arab Emirates portal This article is supported by WikiProject United Arab Emirates (assessed as Mid-importance).

Approved list of sources?

Following the recent removal of content by Itsmejudith because "We don't have Controversy sections, and don't use either the Daily Mail or the Socialist Party as references." I have been trying to find a list of approved sources to use on Wikipedia. Can anyone point me in the right direction? If the use of external material is now subject to censorship then I for one would appreciate the provision by the Wikipedia elite of an approved list of sources. Thanks. Qxv (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We don't have an approved list of sources, but you can get lots of help and advice on sourcing from the reliable sources noticeboard. There was a debate about use of the Daily Mail which was covered in the external press. Actually, we might use it occasionally, but I think you will agree that it is hardly suitable for an article about a university. The Socialist Party is a bit different, and has rarely been discussed, but if a point it makes is notable, it would be covered in the local or national press. Article structure guidelines are at WP:WikiProject Universities which you would be very welcome to join if you are interested in such articles. As a project member I have been working through articles on UK institutions, bringing them into conformity. But note that the guidelines themselves are a matter of consensus between editors. Itsmejudith (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

University ratings

(I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)

There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 22:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have, I hope, rectified the situation in this article.--Lapin rossignol (talk) 18:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the famous alumini? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.48.253 (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.bolton.ac.uk/AboutUs/KeyFacts/OurOrigins.aspx. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2015121710016642.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Angus Guilherme¶ 11:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on University of Bolton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I want to study here Iam from libya Aya mlitan (talk) 23:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on University of Bolton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bradshawgate fire

How do we tackle this one? I noted the fire at the Cube early on the morning of 16th November Philip Cross corrected me. I made a point of stating that the Cube was privately owned and parked the note on this page for a lack of anything more obvious- I think that a one liner is justified.Proxima Centauri has written a whole sub-section. But is the wrong place.

The issues are incredibly significant and need even wider discussion but the only connection I can see with U of B, is that the victims and two casualities were students here. Should this be an Article or parked elsewhere, what would its title be- Can we justify Wikinotablity WP:GNG. Can it be worked up as a DYK before the UK election? I need a anchor so I can link it to other fire and political articles. Suggestions. --ClemRutter (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]