Jump to content

Talk:University of Colorado Denver/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nascar1996 19:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    The article has very good language in it. Nascar1996 00:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance:
    The style of this article matches all the rules. Nascar1996 00:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    The references are accurate and completely describes the topic. Nascar1996 00:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    The article is good here.Nascar1996 00:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
    The references are probably very hard to find. Nascar1996 00:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Good here. Nascar1996 00:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    The information is mostly about the topic. Nascar1996 00:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    I didn't see anything wrong with the article here. Nascar1996 00:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    The article looks good in this stand point. Nascar1996 00:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    One image does not have the fair use rationale. Nascar1996 00:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

  1. B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    The images in the article are placed appropriately where they should be.The captions are really good, too. Nascar1996 00:34, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    The article is very good, but it can be better. Nascar1996 00:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to add it to all the appropriate topic. Thank You. Nascar1996 00:59, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]