Talk:University of Cambridge/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Notified:Bwithh, Stephen Turner, Bluap, Mrh30, Richie, A.C. Norman, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject England, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle Ages, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject University of Cambridge, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cambridge--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As part of the GA Sweeps, I am reviewing this article. I find that it is in striking distance of the current standards listed at WP:WIAGA for a WP:GA. Although it satisfies most requirements, I am quite disappointed in its citation standards. It has numerous entire paragraphs without citation. It also has a few {{fact}} tags needing replacement. Concerned editors would do well to give this article an entire overhaul. I think it might be better structured without so many short sections which causes a bloated table of contents. I will reevaluate this article at some point after seven days from now to see if any issues have been resolved.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 23:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article also has deadlinks.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a disambiguation link.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]