Talk:University College Dublin Law Society

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article was nominated for deletion on 26 July 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

Notability

There was considerable doubt about the notability of this society expressed in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University College Dublin Law Society discussion in December 2009. In particular editors noted absence of significant coverage in reliable, published secondary sources, especially ones independent from the school. If the article continues to be unsupported by such secondary sources, it is very likely to be nominated again. So it behooves supporters of continuing this article to find those sources, if they exist. --Bejnar (talk) 08:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]