Talk:Universal's Halloween Horror Nights/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   There's practically no prose in this article except for three or four paragraphs, articles cannot be made out of lists (see: Wikipedia:EMBED). There are many Manual of Style problems and grammar problems as well, here are some of them:

• The lead does not summarize the whole article.
• Inline citations should go after any punctuation such as a comma or a period. For examples see Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline_reference
• The events should be summarized and, if there's enough reliable information, moved into a new article.
• Numerous minor typos such as: "so it would be for accepting among", "of the Director , a film", "deaths. On August 12. the", etc.
• Too much jargon and self-referencing that makes it hard to follow the article.

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Only two reliable sources that come from a third-party, published source; that's too much original research.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   How about some financial information? How much does Universal make each year? Do many people turn up for this thing? There are too many unanswered questions and too much about the fictional part of this event.

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Please see What makes a Good Article? before renominating. Happy editing!.--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 18:08, 15 September 2008 (UTC)