Talk:Units of measurement in transportation

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Kilometerton was copied or moved into Units of transportation measurement with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

I hope this standard never catches on, people utilize personal transportation because its personal, and therefore easily customizable. It is very difficult to get people to carpool, even giving them a special, uncongested lane in rushhour doesn't work, although it is quite convenient for those wishing to make dates or family trips when the freeways are full of commuters! If this standard does catch on, it will result in making intelligent choices more difficult for consumers, and the guy with the Hummer H2 will actually be able to claim that he gets better mileage than many motorcycles - gag. Zaphraud 02:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a measure of quantity. Its scope does not include quality, sorry. Soredewa 07:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal with kilometerton

The proposal is fairly self explainatory. I might do it myself, except I thought the sources may be useful and I don't speak German Nil Einne (talk) 11:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree: it's exactly why this here article exists in the first place. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 02:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the spelling kilometerton is not very English-like: (quite German-American!)

The reason for use of french spelling tonne is to distinguish it from short ton. Google matches in lr=lang_en

kilometerton: 43 kilometreton: 0 kilometre-ton: 244 kilometer-ton: 1,040 kilometer-tonne: 29 kilometre-tonne: 202 tonne-kilometre: 10,100 tonne-kilometer: 2,480 ton-kilometre: 3,040 ton-kilometer: 12,500

I do not know which of the above are acceptable in English texts, sorry. --Soredewa (talk) 11:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Units of transportation measurement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141109120115/http://www.iata.org:80/ps/publications/wats-passenger-carried.htm to http://www.iata.org/ps/publications/wats-passenger-carried.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]