Talk:United States v. Ball

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Can this be summarized? It is currently rather long. (There's a lot of Latin in there too).

Did this case set some important precedent of American law? If not then why do we have this article? If it did set an important precedent then what was it? It seems buried in here.

Case name??

This case is listed as "United States v. Ball" on LexisNexis, and listed as "Ball v. U.S." on Findlaw. I'm not sure which is correct. One thing is for sure though, this article needs to be rewritten. --Eastlaw 19:12, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know why it's so long ...

Whoever wrote it pasted the entirety of the majority opinion in the article! The entire thing doesn't need to be here, that's what FindLaw is for (and a very good service, too).

As for whether or not the issue raised is relevant ... it seems relevant enough, seeing as how it involves voiding of convictions based on faulty indictments. --ThatBajoranGuy 09:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessed

At start class, does not meet standards of B Class as written. Fails B1 - not suitably referenced, B2 - is a verbatim copy of the opinion, B3 - no defined structure, B4/5/6 - see B2. Needs considerable work, which I will try to do as I get a chance. GregJackP Boomer! 17:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]