Talk:United States involvement in regime change in Latin America/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about United States involvement in regime change in Latin America. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2021 and 27 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): WishIWasOnWiki. Peer reviewers: 00matthew2000, CharlesH.Woo.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Terrible.
Sorry but this article is terrible. It ignores the larger context of the Cold War and America’s perception of the threat of the spread of Communism. The influence of NSC 68 is ignored even though it drove America’s foreign policy during the Cold War. https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsc-hst/nsc-68.htm
Also, some sections have nothing to do with US involvement in regime change in Latin America. Fr example, the first part of the Panama section. If a student gave this to me for a grade, he’d get a ‘D’ at best. --97.79.29.52 (talk) 12:39, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hello friend. Thanks for pointing this out. Your comments sound reasonable, so if you have time, I would encourage you to start editing the article and fixing the issues you see. If you delete content, make sure to justify it in the edit summary. Use inline citations as much as possible and for anything that might be challenged by other editors. There are two ways to edit: source editor and visual editor. I recommend visual editor since it makes inline citations very easy (just hit the "cite" button). Also, feel free to create an account to get access to some quality of life features such as pinging, watchlist, and others. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
It is extremely biased, but unfortunately that's Wikipedia, and we can't change it. There is no point in getting into an edit war with jobless leftists, who will ultimately win with numbers and sympathetic admins. jej1997 (talk) 19:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)