Talk:United States Senate Vice Presidential Bust Collection

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

VP Joe Biden

Biden's name should be removed, as Senate's Bust Collection doesn't include a VP until he's left office. GoodDay (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Missing VPs

Does anyone know why Al Gore and Dick Cheney do not have busts in this collection? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 20:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a time-delay between term completion and commissioning of new busts. The present collection only includes vice presidents up to Dan Quayle. It is not clear if it will continue to add new busts; I was not able to find any plans for expansion on the official Senate website; but historically, the new busts seem to be added some time after the vice president's term ends. Nimur (talk) 21:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted photos

Would photos individuals take of the busts (i.e., vacation photos and the like) also be excluded under the copyright restriction? If so, why? Esprix (talk) 17:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Even Under Government Contract

Since the busts are paid for by the Senate under contract with the artists, I wondered if they would be considered works of the government that could not be copyrighted. I'm sure others had this question, so I will leave this info here. It turns out the artists still own the copyright until they expire:

"Unlike works of the U.S. Government, works produced by contractors under government contracts are protected under U.S. Copyright Law. (See Schnapper v. Foley, 667 F.2d 102 (D.C. Cir. 1981)..."

https://cendi.gov/publications/04-8copyright.html#41

OCNative (talk) 05:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harry truman bust

It is past the creators death by 70 years meaning the bust of harry truman should be allowed right Journey896 (talk) 18:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I had this image deleted back in 2016 off commons[1] as it was very clearly still under copyright 6 years ago. It seems that a re-uplodad of the image was deleted based off my deletion request from 2016.[2] Now that 70 years have passed since the artist died, I will leave it up to people that are better with copyright to figure out if it is now applicable even though it was not carved before 1926.--Found5dollar (talk) 01:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI the file was undeleted on commons after a discussion.[3] I will add it back in here.--Found5dollar (talk) 01:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]