Talk:United States Senate Special Committee to Investigate Crime in Interstate Commerce

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

U.S. Congress Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) Thing(s).

What a timely response!

The hearings were held in 1951, and, "as a direct result", RICO is passed in 1970. How resposnive is the U.S. Congress if this is true? An explanation of this snail's pace belongs in the article.75.246.142.16 (talk) 00:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you challenging the citation of your own accord? Wikipedia's citation policy is quite clear on how to do this. You, personally, may not like it that Congress took 20 years to respond to the call. You, personally, may not find this timely. But the cite is the cite, and the person who authored the cite is an expert. If you disagree, find a source that backs up your claim, add text to the article that notes the the disagrement, and cite this text using an inline footnote. - Tim1965 (talk) 13:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]