Talk:United States President's Commission on CIA Activities within the United States

Cold War Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States President's Commission on CIA Activities within the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312095833/http://bss.sfsu.edu/fischer/IR%20360/Readings/pike.htm to http://bss.sfsu.edu/fischer/IR%20360/Readings/pike.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

...but how exactly can this be considered an unimportant subject in American history? Part of true scholarship is to properly distinguish what is important from what is not. Does this project does not include experts in US and western history? If so, how does it justify concluding that the description of this nefarious chapter in US intelligence hisory—and the various policy and legislative ramifications of the publicised discoveries of CIA actions, before and after—a low priority? These questions come from individual generally sympathetic to the role that intelligence agencies play in modern political life. 2601:246:CA80:3CB5:C485:7DF3:E0C4:3C40 (talk) 22:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why no findings or recommendations?

This article provides only an overview and provides minimal data people would actually be interested in finding related to it's topic. I think information regarding the findings would be appropriate as it would be similar to other articles. Sephiroth storm (talk) 15:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

Made significant addition to the article, significantly increased its size. Didn't remove anything major but added new info on the background, investigation, and aftermath, especially relating to the Church Committee. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicdoughboy (talk • contribs) 12:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]