Talk:House Democratic Caucus

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

U.S. Congress High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) People(s).

Requested move 10 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONSISTENCY (especially with the recently moved articles Senate Democratic Caucus and Senate Republican Conference). Colonestarrice (talk) 17:19, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:CONCISE and nom's reasons. Rreagan007 (talk) 21:49, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Move to House Democratic caucus etc. The move appears reasonable, but the "caucus" should not be capitalised, as it is not a proper noun / proper name. Per MOS:CAPS, we would only write it with a capital if the phrase is "consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources". Yet when I look at sources I see plenty that downcase the C: [1][2][3][4] etc. Thanks — Amakuru (talk) 22:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is correct. "Caucus" here isn't being used generically, it appears to be part of the name of the organization. See here Rreagan007 (talk) 04:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support original move request. --Comment by Selfie City (talk about my contributions) 22:54, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

US Democratic Party Logo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]