This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
I’m not a believer in global warming, it seems the United States forest service is. Controlled burns, burns off all the “mulch” on the ground. (Pine needles,fir needles,grass,stick…) That dries out the ground,erosion. They should be trying to machanical thinning everything they can. For forest health, that is the superior choice! Controlled burns do very little good, a lot of time creates worse forest health. I cannot the F.S. has sold the public on it. 2001:5B0:250D:858:491A:34D2:E09C:653B (talk) 23:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]