Talk:United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Pass GA.

I encourage you to improve this article. As of now, it is just barely a GA or not a GA. Some things to consider are:

notable cases. This is the authors' opinion or original research. This is not to say the opinion is not valid.

There is not a good balance between explaining the federal court system in general and what is different about Missouri.

There's also conflicting information. SE division mentioned but also the S division.

TeacherA (talk) 01:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)