Jump to content

Talk:United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Garbled table

[edit]

Page setup is garbled after table of former. I correct this by replacing

{{end U.S. judgeship Former}}

with the standard pipe-syntax table-end marker |}, which I admit is quick but dirty. Someone more knowledgeable than I on the {{start / {{end syntax may want to change this to avoid mixed syntax. Stefan Ivanovich 11:26, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what's going on. While {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} did redirect to {{end box}} and a certain user did move the {{end box}} template, that should not have affected the {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} template. I'm wondering if somebody attempted to upgrade the underlying MediaWiki software and broke something. In any case, I've got the {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} template working.
Also, I wrote the edit summary before I saw that you had posted on the discussion page. I think my edit summary was too harsh, particularly for someone who went to the trouble of posting on the talk page, so I apologize for that.
DLJessup (talk) 13:22, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Header for current lineup

[edit]

The heading is now inaccurate. It says that this is the court as of the elevation of Alito to the Supreme Court. Judge Rosenn has since died, and his death has now been reflected in the table. So it's no longer a table of the court as of Alito's elevation but as of Rosenn's death. That should be changed, but I'm not sure exactly what it should say. Should the Alito reference stay in there? I imagine part of the purpose of that was to make it clear that this takes his elevation into account, and maybe there's still reason for mentioning that, but I wouldn't know how to say it to make it accurate about reflecting Judge Rosenn's death. — Parableman (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Future Vacancy Coming

[edit]

Judge Roth will take Senior Status on May 31, 2006. The info is here: [1]. Let's remember to update then.--Smashingworth 20:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Table standardization

[edit]

Please note and contribute to this discussion. Billyboy01 (talk) 23:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]