Talk:United States Conciliation Service

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from United States Conciliation Service appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 November 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the United States Conciliation Service, which was part of the U.S. Department of Labor, came to an end because the writers of the Taft–Hartley Act thought that the service was too partial to labor?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United States Conciliation Service.

Wikipedia

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Organized Labour Low‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 01:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the United States Conciliation Service, which was part of the U.S. Department of Labor, came to an end because the writers of the Taft–Hartley Act thought the service was too partial to labor? Source: see footnote 8 in article
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/James Edward Moore

Created by Wasted Time R (talk). Self-nominated at 00:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/United States Conciliation Service; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Article looks well written and referenced. QPQ done. Wasted Time R, in what page/column does the NYT support this claim? It's a decent-sized article, so I'm thinking I missed it. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 19:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The ed17: Thanks for doing the review and yes it's a bit hard to spot. It's page 4, column 7, right below the "The Day in Washington" box, the paragraph that starts "This section opens with ..." and the following paragraph that starts "By making this service ...". Wasted Time R (talk) 10:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wasted Time R:

Brilliant, thank you, I did indeed miss it! This is ready to go. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 18:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]