Talk:United Kingdom general elections overview

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Dear Friends. I would like to correct the following website: United Kingdom general elections overview https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_general_elections_overview In the table of electorial results for the years 1924, 1923, 1922, there are absent the Title and Results of the Co-operative Party that contested single these elections! The Co-operative Party got in these elections 5-6-4 MP¨s!!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-operative_Party And only after the Cheltenham Agreement with the Labour party (1927) begining 1929 gen. election started the Co-operative Party contesting in Association with the Labour Party! And special question. Why are the Labour Party´s electorial results (begining GE 1929 to 2017 stated so historically uncorrect and not simple devided in results of each contesting Party? For example: GE 2017: Labour Party 282 (LP 244 + CP 38) / 650 (seats)

With Respect František Stočes, Prague, Czech Republic fr.stoces@volny.cz

Exit polls

I would like to know if I may be permitted to post a summary of BBC exit polls from 1970 onwards versus the actual result Harry Hayfield 18:28, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BBC UK 2001 Map.jpg

Image:BBC UK 2001 Map.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:UK 1992 (Notionals).jpg

Image:UK 1992 (Notionals).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Outline

Why is the written in reverse chronological order? A History should begin at the oldest point in time, and move forward. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.78.221 (talk) 01:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2010

It has still not been updated following the 2015 elections. --Andrew of Ware (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will this page be updated after the election this year please? SmokeyTheCat •TALK• 18:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question! Norman21 (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those not voting

These should also be included on the graph as they are a large and growing percentage of the population who feel that no party represents them. SmokeyTheCat •TALK• 20:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I realise that this is a 6 year old comment, but I suspect such a feeling still applies. It is, then, worth pointing out that those who cannot be bothered to vote are irrelevant as concerns the result of an election except with regards to turnout. dpchalmers (talk) 10:52, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]