Talk:United Kingdom Election Results/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Fine
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- OK, another excellent article. One tiny quibble - in the section Contents: you have the sentence: As of 2007, the website was located at www.election.demon.co.uk.. It is still there so perhaps this phrase could be updated. I will pass the article and leave it to your judgement on the update. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, and Done. Cirt (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)